The quarterback conundrum continues in Pittsburgh

The list of potential names at QB continues to dwindle down for the Steelers, with no firm solution in sight. We know the names left in the mix, and they all leave much to be desired.

The money that Aaron Rodgers reportedly wants is far too high for his age, potential attitude problem, and his busted Dan Marino (Marino was the first player I knew of that tore his Achilles tendon, so that body part is forever thought of as a Dan Marino in my mind) will leave him as a sitting duck behind a line that is sure to experience pass-pro growing pains this season. People said Wilson can no longer move like he once could, but Rodgers literally can not move at all. He spent all of last year in Pistol or Shotgun, and the Jets ran almost zero play-action or used motion. Now think about what an Arthur Smith offense is built on, and it seems like a match made far south of heaven. Combine that with his penchant for snide remarks calling out receivers and the combustible nature of Pickens and Metcalf, and that’s a Steelers locker room primed for disaster…although the thought of Metcalf grabbing Rodgers in a headlock does put a smile on my face.

Russell Wilson should be cheaper, and if the Steelers do manage to keep Pickens on the roster after the addition of DK Metcalf, it will at least set him up for the only pass he seems to be able to throw. It will be moon balls galore, and under the best of situations, that would force teams to keep two safeties deep and lighten the box for the running game. An offense based on one working pass route, however, is doomed to stall out.

There have been talks that Mason Rudolph could be an option, but I can’t imagine he would ever want to come back to this organization. Also, after watching some of his games as a starter in Tennessee this year, if Mike Tomlin actually does place a priority on his non-losing season streak, that would probably be a last resort emergency option. Mason is good for relief in a pinch, but starter quality he is not.

One name that excites me is Joe Milton III. The Patriots are rumored to be interested in a trade. I watched his only start against the Bills last year, and I remembered being extremely impressed. I am not one to trust my memory anymore, so I rewatched the game today. Milton’s play was as good as I remembered. Drake May played one series. It was a three and out, with a high incomplete pass to a tight end followed by a sack. Milton came in and started the game 11 out of 11 with 139 yards and two touchdowns, one passing and one by way of a read option rush.

Yes, the Bills were sitting several starters. The Pats were also sitting some starters as well, and Milton was not getting helped by his offensive line. He was constantly picking up 3rd and long situations with pinpoint throws after his running game put them behind the chains. He had great pocket awareness, shrugged off sacks like a young Big Ben, kept his eyes downfield, and delivered more strikes to the middle of the field in one game than I saw all year from Fields or Wilson. Even with a leaky line letting free rushers in, Milton was not panicked or rushed, and never left the pocket early, but when he did, it resulted in huge chunks of yards with his legs. The game looked slow for him, and playing against starters or not, it was impressive for his first action in the league. On one play in particular, he overcame a bad snap and rushers in his face to roll out, reset his feet, and throw a rope down the middle for a 48 yard touchdown. It was the first time in 15 games that a Patriots receiver went over 100 yards.

I know it’s irrational to anoint a guy after one start in a meaningless game. Scott Mitchell and Gus Frerotte come to mind as back-ups that received big contracts after one good game and then went on to do…well…not much. Gus did give himself a concussion and a strained neck after headbutting a padded wall…good times.

No matter if the Steelers roll the dice with an aging Rodgers with his snarky attitude and tenuous Dan Marino both ready to snap at any time or keep Russell Wilson and his one trick pony passing arsenal, a quality back-up will be an absolute requirement. Based on a one game sample size, Milton would be as good a choice as any and possibly a better option than anyone being considered in the pole position right now. This feels like a “take a flyer” year and the schedule is crazy hard once again. As the team sits right now, I would bet the under on getting to .500 for the first time in years. Maybe Milton doesn’t know any better and can mess around and make me lose my money. I know I would feel better cheering for him, regardless. I like to root for the man instead of the laundry, and if he lands in Pittsburgh as a backup and ends up running the show, that would be an easy story to get behind.

Subscribe to SCN

Sign up below for the latest news, stories and podcast from our affiliaties.

Follow Our Podcast

Sign up below to join our podcast:

Join Now
7 Comments
4.7 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
7 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Edward Carmichael
Edward Carmichael
6 hours ago

a true Pittsburgh Steelers fan, since the 70’s if the Steelers can bring back Mason Rudolph I hope Mike Tomlin don’t mess it up by not given Mason Rudolph the starting quarterback position until a better option comes along

Ceejaysquared
Ceejaysquared
6 hours ago

I like it!

I admit that I’m grasping at straws at this point, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that the QB situation is not getting fixed this year. The reasonable options with the potential for success (emphasize *potential*) are gone – Fields, Darnold. Of the remaining guys – Wilson, Winston, we know their limitations, and they are substantial. I’m not even going to mention cancer boy – because if they sign him, they’re admitting that it’s over.

I still think you fix everything else, because the QB situation can’t be fixed this year. Draft someone in later rounds and hope that you found an overlooked bargain, sign this kid to be the bridge backup while you find out what you’ve got, and fix the position in 26.

Mr.87
Mr.87
17 minutes ago
Reply to  Ceejaysquared

Based on what? Nobody has yet to give me some legit reason as to why the 26 draft is the best option to find a QB other than the stupid reason of “More Names”. What I see are fans falling in love with guys like Iamaleava when they flat out overlook his bad and I do mean bad performances vs Arkansas, Georgia and most importantly the Buckeyes. Arch Manning: You mean the guy that didn’t beat out Ewers and whose going to start a full season for the 1st time. As a matter of fact I should be on board with the 26 Class cause apparently it cannot fail.

Jon Lochlin
Jon Lochlin
6 hours ago

At this point, I am not sure why people are so adverse to going QB in this year’s draft. Yes, I realize that this draft isn’t supposed to be good for QBs. Yes, I realize that next year’s draft QBs are supposed to be better than this year’s. Still, there isn’t much difference between relying on Joe Milton III and his one game of NFL experience and any draft QB this year with no games of NFL experience.

Well, there is one difference. Milton III was 6th round draft pick whereas Shedeur Sanders, Jaxon Dart et al will be a lot more heralded than that. Bring back Mason Rudolph as the fall back. If it doesn’t work then do it again next year.

Is that radical? It sure is. A team that is considering spending $40 million plus on a broken old QB though could probably use a little radical.

CeeJay
CeeJay
2 hours ago
Reply to  Jon Lochlin

I can only speak for myself, but my pessimism for this year’s draft comes from the fact that Sanders and Ward won’t be around when we pick (and neither shows signs of being the kind of generational talent you mortgage the future to trade up for) and the further fact that it being a generally acknowledged weak QB draft means that QBs will be “over drafted” relative to their value.

Do I think we should take a swing at Shough, Dart, Howard, or Ewers in a later round? Absolutely. But I definitely don’t think they’d be ready to contribute next year.

Mr.87
Mr.87
6 minutes ago
Reply to  CeeJay

That’s fine so then why not do what KC did with Mahomes? You sit him basically his whole 1st year behind a veteran who can actually “teach” him the necessary things to thrive in the NFL as a starting QB. See what many Steeler Fans fail to say is “We want a QB from the 26 Draft to take the job from Day 1 and do what Stroud and Daniels did their rookie years” not realizing that not every rookie QB performs that way. Does anybody remember Joe Burrow’s rookie year? How bout Josh Allen’s rookie year? Now a days Steeler fans see what Stroud and Daniels did in year 1 and believe how ever wrong it is that every QB that comes into year 1 has to ball out like those 2.

Now I know some will say I’m right and others will undoubtedly say “Well we don’t care what those other teams did with their rookie QB’s” and my response to that is: Yeah, you only care when it suits your narrative and the not the right one.

I said that the Steelers should take a QB in the mid Rd’s of this draft but not once did I say they were the long-term answer cause I don’t know if they are and neither do you but to just flat dismiss those guys is a grave misjudgment on Steeler Fans.

JoeBwankenobi
JoeBwankenobi
3 hours ago

I’d get on board with this. They might as well contact the Colts and see how available Richardson is too. I also like (I think it was Bill Dudas’) idea to get the buried kid in Tampa. Pratt maybe?? Seriously, anything is better than 90M for a 40+ statue who’s attitude shows up 3 minutes before his body.

Comment Policy

Please read through our Comment Policy before commenting.

Got It!