Scouting The Mock: A look at the latest Steelers 2025 mock drafts, Part 5

Wow—hard to believe we’re already less than two weeks away from the NFL Draft kicking off in Green Bay. With that in mind, it feels like the perfect time to grade some more mock drafts floating around the Steelers community.

As always, we’ll take a look at one mock from an analyst or member of the draft media. But for a bit of a twist this week, the second mock won’t be a computer simulation—instead, it’ll be what I personally think the Steelers will do come draft weekend.

If you want to see how things have shifted since the last edition of this series, make sure to check that out first!


First mock:

Steelers 7-Round Mock Draft: Pittsburgh Predicted To Overhaul Offense” – Cameron Sheath/Pro Football Network                

Context: Trade: Steelers receive No. 7 | Jets receive No. 21 overall pick, No. 83 overall pick, 2026 first

R1 Pick 7: QB Shedeur Sanders, Colorado
R4 Pick 123: RB Damian Martinez, Miami
R5 Pick 156: DT Riley Mills, Notre Dame
R6 Pick 185: OT Ajani Cornelius, Oregon
R7 Pick 229: CB  Jordan Hancock, Ohio State

Summary:

A very bold move kicks this mock off—a heavy trade-up for Shedeur Sanders, signaling that the Steelers are putting all their eggs in that basket. Sanders is the most accurate quarterback in this class when it comes to the short and intermediate areas of the field and is generally seen as the consensus number two at the position behind Cam Ward.

There are questions surrounding his ceiling, as well as some off-the-field distractions that might follow him. But if the Steelers were to make a move like this, it would show they have enormous faith in Sanders to become their franchise signal-caller.

With the three-round gap, the Steelers add to the running back room by selecting Miami’s bruising back, Damian Martinez. He might be the most violent runner in the class, consistently fighting through contact, but that doesn’t mean he lacks speed or struggles in space. Martinez is a relatively complete back who would likely earn short-yardage reps in the current rotation thanks to his physical running style.

The Steelers would then address arguably their biggest need in this draft by selecting Notre Dame’s Riley Mills to bolster the defensive line. Mills has flown somewhat under the radar throughout the process, but he brings a solid collegiate résumé with flashes of pass-rushing production that suggest there’s more upside to be tapped into at the next level.

Tackles have become gold in today’s NFL due to the scarcity of functional players at the position. The thinking now is that drafting one is an investment—because if you find a serviceable option, you might get a compensatory pick return down the line if you choose not to re-sign them. Ajani Cornelius would represent the Steelers’ next developmental project at that position.

This mock has the Steelers closing things out by selecting their first defensive back of the draft in Jordan Hancock, a slot/safety hybrid from the national champion Ohio State Buckeyes. He’d bring valuable competition and depth to a position the Steelers traditionally haven’t invested heavily in.

Garde C


Mock draft two:

My Steelers “What I think they will do mock” on the PFF mock draft simulator. 

Context: Steelers receive No. 28 & 60 | Lions receive No. 21 & 5th 2026                                                    

R1 Pick 28: DT Derrick Harmon, Oregon
R2 Pick 60: QB Jalen Milroe, Alabama
R3 Pick 83:  WR Kyle Williams, Washington State
R4 Pick 123: HB Jaydon Blue, Texas
R5 Pick 156: DL Tim Smith, Alabama
R6 Pick 185: OT Jalen Travis, Iowa State
R7 Pick 229: S Malachi Moore, Alabama

The defensive lineman who fits the classic mold of a Steelers lineman is Oregon’s Derrick Harmon. Standing at 6’5″ and weighing 310 pounds, Harmon saw a major jump in his pass rush disruption this past season, tallying 43 hurries in 2025—a highly impressive number. While he’ll need to improve his ability to finish plays in the backfield, but the tools are clearly there. Harmon projects as a potential successor to Cameron Heyward and could be an impact player as early as 2025.

The trade down gave the Steelers the flexibility to take a real swing at the quarterback position without compromising the rest of their draft class. In this scenario, I went with the one guy—outside of Cam Ward—who flashes superman-like tools: Jalen Milroe. In my opinion, he’s exactly the kind of quarterback the Steelers should be targeting. He arguably has the best raw traits in this class, and most of his flaws are coachable. That’s not to say he’s guaranteed to become a starter, but when you combine his physical upside with the strong character reviews he’s received, there’s a real chance he could put it all together in the right environment.

The Steelers don’t know what they have in Roman Wilson and are going into the last year of George Pickens’ and Calvin Austin’s contracts. Kyle Williams could come in as the best route technician in the room and plays a similar style to former Steeler Diontae Johnson, which is a profile missing in the room.

Speed seems to be a trend in the Steelers’ interest at the running back position this draft cycle, and Jaydon Blue is all speed. He erases tackling angles at all levels of the field with his dynamic athletic traits and also provides the Steelers with a legit home run hitter out of the backfield.

Even with the selection of Derrick Harmon, the Steelers still haven’t addressed the nose tackle position. Alabama’s Tim Smith could fill that gap as the kind of run-stuffer they need to anchor the middle of their defense. Adding Smith would go a long way toward completing a revamped defensive line—something that increasingly feels like a top priority for the Steelers in this draft.

Similar to the first draft Jalen Travis is a tackle who can be a project type player, who at his size could become the next in line to provide quality depth behind two first round tackles.

A very common theme has been slot options late in the draft and Malachi Moore is a name that sticks out due to his leadership and versatile skillset could provide the depth required in multiple positions.

Grade A-


Personally, a trade-up is off the table for me as a Steelers fan, simply because it really limits the rest of your draft and doesn’t allow you to properly address some of the holes on the roster. That’s why the first mock received a lower grade—not because of the players selected, but because of the overall impact on roster construction. On the flip side, the trade-down in the second draft gives you the flexibility to take the swing at quarterback I believe they want to make, while still landing an impact defensive lineman and filling out the rest of the roster.

With the draft just around the corner how would you feel about either of these classes?

Subscribe to SCN

Sign up below for the latest news, stories and podcast from our affiliaties.

Follow Our Podcast

Sign up below to join our podcast:

Join Now
11 Comments
5 3 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
BBnG
BBnG
1 day ago

I would HATE Mock 1. Made even worse by the fact that it includes giving up next year’s first round pick. HARD PASS.
I won’t pretend to know enough about the choices after Milroe in Mock 2, so I can’t say much beyond I would definitely prefer it out of these 2 scenarios.

Archie W
Archie W
7 hours ago
Reply to  BBnG

I agree anything using draft comp for next year I am
Out on personally

JoeBwankenobi
JoeBwankenobi
1 day ago

I hate the trade up draft. My goodness C- is waaaay too generous. That’s an F if I’ve ever seen one.

I like your draft, and would be happy of it went that way.

Jon Lochlin
Jon Lochlin
1 day ago

The 7th pick in the draft has a trade value of 1500. The 21st pick has a trade value of 800 so the Steelers would have to find another 700 or so points to make such a move. Assuming that the Steelers are picking around 20 again next year then, from a strictly value standpoint, trading next year’s 1 to get to this year’s 7th pick actually makes sense. I am NOT saying it’s logical to do so, just that next year’s first is what it should take to move up that far. Given that the Steelers are likely to have 4 comp picks next year, it makes such a trade even more palatable.

Again, I am not advocating that the Steelers do this. Likewise, it has nothing to do with Shadeur Sanders for the Steelers can pick someone else at 7. I am only saying trading next year’s 1 for the 7th pick this year isn’t as outlandish as it might seem.

BBnG
BBnG
1 day ago
Reply to  Jon Lochlin

That can be true in terms of draft value, but it can still be a terrible idea. My issue with it is Sanders isn’t really what I’d consider a sure fire pick to make. And considering he’s basically the consensus second best QB in a draft class that’s mostly viewed as weak at the position, I’d say there are very few who would argue that he’s a sure thing.
That’s a LOT to give up for a guy who isn’t even viewed as a sure thing (I know there is no such thing as a sure thing in the draft).
Heck, I’m not sure I’d even give that much up to go grab the consensus #1 QB in this draft, Cam Ward.

JoeBwankenobi
JoeBwankenobi
1 day ago
Reply to  BBnG

This is especially crazy considering they’re also giving up their #3 in a draft where they already don’t have a #2, for a QB that may not be better than the one they can very likely sit and grab at 21. No way. No chance.

BBnG
BBnG
1 day ago
Reply to  JoeBwankenobi

Yep. For a team with as many holes/needs as we have, walking away with only 5 players drafted (4 of which taken round 4 or later) is a TERRIBLE idea.

Jon Lochlin
Jon Lochlin
1 day ago
Reply to  JoeBwankenobi

Agreed but the plethora of picks next year would offset the lack of them this year.

Again, I am not saying that this is a good idea. I am only saying that if the Steelers were to make a trade like this, no matter the player selected, this actually isn’t a bad time to do it given next year’s picks.

JoeBwankenobi
JoeBwankenobi
1 day ago
Reply to  Jon Lochlin

Understood, but they are not locked into those comp picks at all, so you can’t count on any of them. Also, why do this this year when it looks like they’re putting the pieces in place to do it next year? This draft would net very little, and after a free agency period where they did very little, you’re mostly running back a team that was middling at best. I’m ok to move up a few spots, but this looks like a Browns move.

Jon Lochlin
Jon Lochlin
1 day ago
Reply to  BBnG

As I pointed out, it’s not about Sanders. It can be about any player. If the Steelers wanted to trade from 21 to 7 to pick a DL that they love then it would take next year’s first round pick to do so. I am only speaking to the mechanics of the trade and not what the trade actually produces.

Last edited 1 day ago by Jon Lochlin
BBnG
BBnG
1 day ago
Reply to  Jon Lochlin

I get it, but I don’t really see any reason to give up that kind of capital to move up in this draft, be it for Sanders or someone else. I included him because that’s where Mock 1 went.
This draft has pretty decent depth at multiple positions the Steelers need to fortify. And outside of MAYBE Jeanty, I don’t think there’s any one kid who stands so far head and shoulders above his peers as to be worth such a move.
Walking away from such a class having made only 5 picks, 4 in the 4th or later, would be a big FAIL IMO.
If we use that plethora of picks next year to move up, it should be in next year’s draft, so we could move up and still walk away with a decent sized batch of rookies.

Comment Policy

Please read through our Comment Policy before commenting.

Got It!
11
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x